On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:37:42PM +0100, Felix wrote: > The intention is to provide some sort of soft "ulimit" at the > application level, in case you want to make sure a certain maximum > amount of memory is not exceeded. Or if you want to benchmark memory > consumption, or do other whacky things. So let's keep it for a while.
But why not just use ulimit? It can be set per process, so I don't see the need to have a second ulimit-like limit inside each process. Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
