On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Dan Leslie <d...@ironoxide.ca> wrote:
> Nice work, contributions are greatly appreciated. :) > > Since you're asking for constructive feedback, two things come to mind: > > It's a matter of taste, but IMHO it's schemier that *descriptive-variable*is > preferable to > *desc-var*, so in your case *s-foo* could easily be *string-foo*. > However, I would drop the prefix altogether, as Chicken supports renaming > on import. So *string-foo* would become *foo* and any prefixing is left > up to the user of your library. > > I'm not certain what you intended by 'official', but if you meant that > you'd like to see it packaged with Chicken then perhaps you should consider > switching the license to Chicken's license. Mind you, GPL3 eggs are happily > accepted, but note that many folks won't touch them for various reasons. > However, if this is a port of an elisp library then likely re-licensing is > not an option. > I would love to package this under the BSD license, but as far as my limited knowledge is concerned, it seems that I must keep the GPL3 license of the original elisp package. If someone is aware of an alternative solution, please speak up and I'll change things accordingly. > Anyhow, thanks for the hard work and the contribution! And welcome to > Chicken-land, come join us on IRC if you get a chance. > Thanks! It's been a joy working with the chicken community so far :) - Nick
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
