Dan Leslie scripsit: > >Of course it would, and the Perl substitute command would be more general > >still. For that matter, you could allow an arbitrary Scheme procedure to > >be provided. But "drop-prefix" is dead simple, has precedent, and is > >easy to understand and use. > > Why not have both?
Okay, let's do it backwards. No precedent. Harder to implement. Harder to document. Harder to use. Ticket #988 filed for drop-prefix. Feel free to file your own ticket or prepare your own patch. -- We are lost, lost. No name, no business, no Precious, nothing. Only empty. Only hungry: yes, we are hungry. A few little fishes, nassty bony little fishes, for a poor creature, and they say death. So wise they are; so just, so very just. --Gollum co...@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users