On Mar 25 2013, Peter Bex wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:52:39AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
On Mar 25 2013, Peter Bex wrote:
These both don't cut it for me.
I'm using rather often (import (only module ....) (except from sonthing))
Both use and require-extension seem to import all bindings.
Please read the manual; USE accepts these import specifiers as well, and
Sorry, I'm confused. A moment ago I tried and it complained.
Dunno what I did wrong.
like I pointed out before, you can also use require-library followed by
an import (the require-library form just loads the code and makes it
available).
OK, so how would this be different from leaving things as they are,
i.e. (declare (uses ..)) instead of re-quire-library?
(Both followed by an import)
Any advantage in using require-library?
Also at the moment I can't really get the thing to use the statically
bound .o files reliably. The stripped down test case picks it up.
But in the full code, it fails with ##sys#require not finding the
code.
I don't understand what you mean by this. USE doesn't work with
statically linked objects, only dynamically linked libraries.
Cheers,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
