Hey! > I've applied the 64-bit fix and partially added the patch regarding > c-string/char-ptrs in mutable struct slots. I'm somehow reluctant to
Thanks! > add the "...*" accessor variant - I fear that this adds a lot of > redundant bindings that are never used in most cases. By prefixing a > slot type with "___pointer" one always has the option to treat a char* > as a pointer object instead of a c-string. If you can live with that, Okies. I can live without the c-pointer version. > I can tag a new version of the bind egg. Otherwise we should discuss > this some more. I don't recall the whole discussion so it is possible > that I have overlooked something important. Sounds great. Andrei _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
