On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:04:56PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:01:31PM -0600, Erik Falor wrote: > > I suppose this is because (require ...) happens at runtime and > > whatever (import ...) does happens when the syntax is expanded. > > > > Is there a clean way to achieve the effect of reporting a missing egg > > with an error message (and leaving my interpreter otherwise usable)? > > Have you tried EVALing it, and wrapping the eval in an exception handler?
No, I hadn't tried that. But it worked beautifully! Thanks for saving my afternoon! -- Erik Falor Registered Linux User #445632 http://linuxcounter.net
pgpQZok3SXEKQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
