Hi, I am not an expert here, but I find these functions ill-defined.
Both take as input a time-vector which already carries the timezone information (seconds west of UTC). So a "time->seconds" function just seems the right thing to me. Having to specify the local/utc prefix feels redundant, confusing and error-prone: (local-time->seconds (seconds->utc-time 0)) -3600.0 (utc-time->seconds (seconds->local-time 0)) 3600.0 Regards, Michele _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
