Caolan McMahon scripsit: > I'm hoping to write (or encourage someone else to write) a memory-only > implementation of the 'level' API, which would be useful for testing > or other circumstances where you want to use a module written to the > 'level' interface without persisting data.
It would be trivial to layer this on top of the rb-tree egg. Since all is in memory, you don't have to bother with the subtleties of constructing a "proper" lazy sequence: just use fold(i) to get an ordinary list and then use list->lazy-seq. The only issue is that the rb-tree egg is GPL3, but that shouldn't matter for testing purposes. You could also ask the author, Ivan Raikov, for a license exception. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org "Why yes, I'm ten percent Jewish on my manager's side." --Connie Francis _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
