Hello Dan,
> I spent some time today looking into what amount of effort it would
> take to add swank-trace-dialog support to the existing SLIME egg; it
> turns out that it's quite doable, but as I have a slew of projects on
> the go I thought I'd gauge if there's any interest outside of my own
> inquisitiveness for such an enhancement?
I might be interested in this but the times I used slime for chicken it
felt a little 'off'. Don't really remember what parts of it though.
Maybe they are the parts you've been submitting patches for.
I was also looking if I could get some more features into the egg,
for example partial completion.
> Relatedly, I've been submitting patches to fix errors in the SLIME egg
> that have resulted from code rot; so if you're like me and you use the
> bleeding edge of Emacs, it should be known that the SLIME egg is sorta
> usable once again.
thanks for that.
> Does anyone know if eldoc support ever functioned with the SLIME egg?
>From the wiki:
Argument hints
start typing an expression (e.g. (call/cc... )) and the argument
list will appear in the minibuffer. Note the function must be
compiled with debug information.
And I can remember it sorta working. But don't take my word for it.
cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
