"Ryuho Yokoyama" <ryu...@ybb.ne.jp> writes: >>Do you have any special reason to be using such an old CHICKEN? > > Yes, as stating in reply mail to Mr. Oleg Kolosov, I am now > converting all my CL code to Scheme(Chicken, Gambit). > In original code there are many "define-macro". Because Chicken Ver > 4 does not support "define-macro" I am > using the Ver 3.
Please note that with CHICKEN 4 it is still possible to write unhygienic macros using explicit / implicit renaming macros. In my experience this is trivial to do most of the time, so instead of using an old version of chicken that is unsupported and misses a lot of performance enhancements (specialisations of code, improvements in the number tower, scheduler bugfixes to name a few) I urge you to reconsider using a recent version. Kind regards, Christian -- May you be peaceful, may you live in safety, may you be free from suffering, and may you live with ease. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
