I'd stick with zmq, particularly considering that you've already begun updating the egg. It also looks like it has a greater amount of community and developer support.
-Dan Matt Gushee <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Dan Leslie <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> You might want to consider the nanomsg egg, which doesn't appear to have >> a wiki page yet. >> >> https://github.com/Adellica/chicken-nanomsg >> > > Oh, great, yet another alternative to consider! :-/ Well, maybe. I've > never heard of nanomsg before. Any idea how widely-used/well-supported it > is? > > PS: I still think the future of the zmq egg should be addressed, even if I > end up not using it. It doesn't seem very useful to have a library binding > that is two major versions behind. Unless someone is using it in > production, I'd say it should either be updated or withdrawn. > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users -- -Dan Leslie _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
