On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:58:19PM -0700, Matt Welland wrote: > This tool was mentioned on the fossil mailing list: > http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/ > > I'm curious, can it be meaningfully be run against a binary generated by > chicken? Or would a native scheme variant be needed?
There's only one way to find out ;) Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
