Ok, I sort of panicked when I saw what looked like regex being deprecated
(read my original message below if you wish). After re-reading the irregex
egg wiki page a few times it looks like all is well assuming these two
things:

1. irregex unit will continue to support reading the pcre syntax
2. those using the backslash substitution destination string syntax be
prepared to write a parser/converter.

As a request to the developers - please consider adding the function from
the regex egg that parses the \N type dest strings to irregex.

Thanks.

Matt
-=-
====== my original "panicked"message =====

>From a comment to Chicken-janitors regarding bug #1189 I saw this:

"This seems to be an undocumented feature of the substring-replace
 function, which allows you to escape the backslash. I would recommend
 using irregex, the regex egg's API is kind of deprecated anyway, and it's
 also not very efficient."

Then in the regex egg wiki page I see:

"It is a thin wrapper around the functionality provided by irregex
<http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Unit%20irregex> and is mostly intended to
keep old code working."

These statements leave me a little concerned as I use the regex egg a fair
amount and I don't have the energy to learn yet another abstraction or to
go back and rewrite old code. More importantly I expose the use of regexes
to users of Megatest and logpro and they have no tolerance for doing
something considered a "standard" in a different way, especially if it
means using something that looks like Scheme.

>From re-reading the irregex egg wiki page I think the only thing I rely on
that is missing is the \1 substitution mechanism. Is there an alternative
syntax? All I see is the following:

(irregex-replace "(.)(.)" "ab" 2 1 "*")

Which would be implemented using a destination of "\2\1*" in
string-substitute. Converting an old-style destination string to the list
of numbers and strings would not be too hard I suppose.

Thanks,

Matt
-=-
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Reply via email to