On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart < [email protected]> wrote:
> Please see some notes that may be relevant to improve your egg: > > - the source repository should not contain binary files (.so). .import > files are automatically generated by csc, so they are not necessary > either. You can safely remove them from the repository. This is the > only critical point, as we don't want to distribute binary files. > Done > > - s/Paramaters/Parameters/ > Doh! Corrected. > > - The code style is a bit unusual for Lisp/Scheme programmers, but still > a matter of personal taste. In case you are interested in idiomatic > style, I recommend http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/style.txt > Thanks, I'm still having a hard time with idiomatic lisp formatting. ;) The end parens all bunched together makes it nigh-impossible for me to *look* at the code and know where one block ends, and as a lisp-newb that's crazy important to me. I get that the tooling in Emacs/Vim makes it easy to highlight the matching paren, but I prefer to not have to ask a machine to explain what I'm looking at to me, especially when I wrote it. ;) I find that as the code stabilizes I tend to reformat it to be more inline with the standard. So, it'll get there, eventually... I do appreciate the pointer though. Speaking of eggs and Salmonella there is one thing that I noticed from Salmonella that I haven’t been able to figure out, that I’ll fix in the next version if someone can tell me how: ==== Tests Ok: 1 Failed: 0 No tests: 0 I can’t find any docs that tell me how to make the Ok: 1 actually show the real number of tests that were run, and I can’t find any docs that tell me the correct / standard way to deal with multi-file tests (multiple load calls in run.scm is what i did). -K! Me: http://www.masukomi.org Adventure!: http://www.CorporateRunaways.com
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
