Awesome, that worked perfectly. On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Jordan Jacobson < [email protected]> wrote:
> thanks :), I'll give it a try > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Peter Bex <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 09:43:46PM -0700, Jordan Jacobson wrote: >> > I'm trying to get a handle on the IUP/LED egg. Ive been going through >> the >> > tutorial page and translating the examples into ones using a .led >> resource >> > file. The example with the menu is not working. I have some pastes here: >> > >> http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=b0e3e10588a202543dca034c884cb885207195c2 >> > >> http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=22dc1555d2f77d1019a14b2582f4756f3afdcec0 >> > >> http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=70951f6ee8c210ab2bd5bd066ab477ad8fba1c82 >> > >> http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=1e6b8ee3891ab5c234c2df891b83f3000eb11467 >> >> Hello Jordan, >> >> I don't know anything about IUP (I've never been able to even get it >> installed), but from the documentation's examples, it looks like LED is >> not linked to Scheme in any way; instead it uses identifiers which are >> similar to the identifiers in Lua. Look at this example: >> >> http://webserver2.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/iup/examples/LED/submenu.led >> or the Lua version: >> http://webserver2.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/iup/examples/Lua/submenu.lua >> >> This means that "menu-item" is not defined in LED. Instead, you'll >> need to use just "item". I suppose Thomas chose to use "menu-item" >> as the identifier in Scheme because "item" is too generic and would >> easily conflict when using other libraries. >> >> Perhaps, if this is too confusing, it may be wise to use exactly the >> same identifiers as Lua and LED use. >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> > >
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
