Hi Peter. Peter Bex <[email protected]> schrieb am 2018-08-14 13:08: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:56:04PM +0200, Sven Hartrumpf wrote: >> Thanks. This helped a lot. >> There are many C library bindings relying on easyffi. >> Are there any plans to port the easyffi egg? > > This is one of those eggs that should really be left in the dust as > things are moved to the new CHICKEN. Bind is the supported and > maintained way of doing FFI in an easier way than the core.
Now I remember to have read this before, sorry. > Also, if at all possible, I'd argue to use the core FFI, to reduce > dependencies. > > Can you give some examples of eggs that use easyffi where it's hard > to convert them to bind or core FFI? No, I was just lazy when porting an egg that relied on easyffi. I will follow your advice now and report if I run into trouble. Ciao Sven _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
