On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 3:07 AM Peter Bex <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think it's the Cygwin project. We are only responsible for ensuring > that it builds and runs correctly on Cygwin. But I'm sure they'll > accept a patch if one of us sends it to them. > > The real problem is keeping it up to date. Just updating it to 5.3.0 > should be a matter of sending a patch, but keeping it up to date, > following up when things break etc is something that really requires > someone who actively uses CHICKEN from Cygwin. > For the foreseeable future I'll once again be running Chicken on Cygwin and building it myself, so I will definitely report if it breaks. However, I think it's enough to send Cygwin updates only for minor versions (5.3, 5.4, etc.) and security patches, not for every single patch that's ever issued.
