On Wednesday, September 9th, 2026 at 14:58, Mario Domenech Goulart <[email protected]> wrote:
> In the meantime, stty has been submitted to C6 [0], but has issues. My > understanding is that both eggs are derived from the stty implementation > by Alex Shinn. Are the two eggs significantly different? If so, should > we have both in C6? If not, which one should we go with? Good question. chibi-stty is based on the current chibi sources, which exports less of the lower-level interface, but has a couple of higher level functions: with-raw-io, get-terminal-width, and get-terminal-dimensions. It may make sense to have one egg to avoid confusion, but for me it would be nice if it was at minimum compatible with the current chibi library by including those higher level functions and a (chibi stty) module name (also for consistency with other chibi libraries ported to CHICKEN). I'd be happy to expose the lower level interface in chibi-stty and add an stty alias for compatibility with C5 stty, or we could add to Erik's stty egg. Diego
