the last one born isn't necessarily thr runt of the litter??? I was
told the other day that the last one born doesn't mean that he or she
would be the runt of the litter.... to my knowledge i thought that the
last one was always the runt but i was never told other wise til
now.... even thought my babby girl just had a litter about 10-11 days
ago i did noticed that the last oone waqs bigger than the first one
born... it was actually backwards... the last one was one of the
biggest and the first one was the smallest. the second one seemed like
she should of been the first one born and the third one seemed like if
he was the only one that was in his place.... so i'm confused now!!!
can someone explain it to me...
------------------------------------
" Lets talk about our wonderful little friends!
Join today! " Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chihuahuas/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chihuahuas/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/