Comment #13 on issue 143 by jlamkw: Handle color profiles in tagged images http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=143
It's really disappointing that Chrome isn't color managed. Safari has been color managed for a long time and so does Firefox 3 (not enabled by default but I heard it will be in 3.5). It's better to get things done the right way while the user base is still relatively small as it will be a much more disruptive change later on. Chrome and IE are holding the web up in terms of digital photo quality. Looking at the whole digital imaging workflow, it's often the output part of the process that is the most limiting, e.g. narrow monitor/printer gamut, color-stupid image rendering software. Input: image sensors are advancing in terms of dynamic range, gamut and bit-depth Processing: most proper image processing software have been color-managed for years Output: even monitor manufacturers are now pushing the technology ahead by producing wide gamut, 10bit+ display panels. Browser is the most important image display software and it's sad to see that it is becoming a bottleneck. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/ Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
