Comment #9 on issue 6381 by [email protected]: Installation on XP SP1 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=6381
Blocking is a lazy solution. If Chrome is properly coded, then any problems that arise from not running on a support platform (ie, missing/incompatible API calls) would fall to the error/exception handling like it would in any good program. The installer should not be responsible for the program’s function; especially since it is not guaranteed to be used at all. Besides, it’s trivial enough to fake an SP level. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/ Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
