Comment #5 on issue 13936 by [email protected]: Implement extension specific events http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=13936
I thought the state in EMS was a bit different since it is really keeping track of ports. Do you think the state should be shared somehow? ""When ExtensionFunctionDispatcher is constructed and deleted, tell ExtensionProcessManager so that it can update its state." I'm a little unclear on this point. By "state", do you just mean the map of extension->process? Of do you envision the EPM keeping track of the page actions as well? I don't think the latter is necessary; we can just keep that info in the renderer." I just mean the map of extension->process. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/ Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
