Comment #22 on issue 11341 by [email protected]: Performance regression on page load/navigation from Chrome 1 to Chrome 2 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=11341
Updates: - added 11994/1495, 11994/2592, 22400/2592 - removed 11991/1501, 11991/1505, 11994/1512 - reran 11991/1495 - add columns tM and Δ#0 (mean delta against row 0) # r_Cr r_V8 t0 t1 t2 tM Δ#0 ---------------------------------------------- 0 11991 1458 1597 1610 1585 1597 --- 1 11991 1495 1944 1966 1970 1959 362 2 11994 1495 1971 1936 1984 1963 366 3 11994 2592 1676 1681 1684 1683 86 4 22400 2592 1890 1875 1859 1874 277 #1 introduced a 362ms regression. #3 shows 86ms (5% perf loss) left to recover from r1495. #4 shows 191ms (12%) of cycler regression in r22400 (TT) currently unclassified. (Thanks to Ivan for the suggestion to run #3, this required a small change to the WebKit glue that should not have affected results.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/ Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
