Comment #31 on issue 18857 by [email protected]: Support for GM Functions (Greasemonkey) in Chrome http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=18857
unsafeWindow indeed is useful in the 99% of scripts that do not store important user data across multiple domains. Given that you already ruled out GM_xmlhttpRequest, what harm could come from exposing the GM script's privates to the web site? The GreaseMonkey script has no more privileges than the origin site. In Opera and Safari, user scripts run in the same namespace as the site itself (equivalent to doing everything through unsafeWindow) and there is no problem with that. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/ Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs
