Comment #9 on issue 23162 by [email protected]: Cache ignored on  
page-refresh for some dynamic scripts with cache-headers
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23162

ref comment#7:

1. I don't see why should that matter. In fact, I have been ignoring the  
request
related to script1.php because I don't see anything weird with them. As a  
semi-
related note, if you load three times script2.php instead of twice, you  
should see
that the third load doesn't hit the server on refresh. Just the first two  
loads.

2. No idea about the data type. Having dynamic parameters of course means  
that each
time we treat them as different resources, completely unrelated with the  
script
received during a previous step.

3. The issue here is that the "normal" path for a request is not a result  
of the user
explicitly refreshing the current page. A regular navigation just sees if  
the cached
resource can be used or not, and given that the expiration date is still in  
the
future, the cached script is just reused (and that goes for clicking on a  
button).
However, if the user hits F5, the request is treated as "make sure that I  
have the
most recent version of this page", so we'll try to fully re-validate  
everything, but
we can't because we don't have a "signature" for the resource (date or  
etag), so we
have to discard the cached version and ask the server. It looks like asking  
for the
script again from the same page is treated as part of the same user action  
(i.e.
another resource from this page must be revalidated), so the script that  
was just
downloaded is discarded again because we cannot re-validate it... and you  
see two
requests hitting the server. If this were just a button on the page, there  
is no
intention to make sure that everything is as fresh as possible, so the  
cached version
would just be reused.

4. Actually, I just answered this one :) One refresh equals two loads that  
must
revalidate the content (with the caveat that there is a list or URLs that  
were
already revalidated).

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

-- 
Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/
Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs

Reply via email to