Comment #66 on issue 18857 by medleymind: Support for GM Functions  
(Greasemonkey) in Chrome
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=18857

"I think it's time to take this discussion to the mailing list"

I tried to post there, but my reply isn't showing up so I have no choice  
but to post it
here:

Thank you for the in depth explanation of the situation, but without  
implementing
unsafeWindow user scripts wouldn't have access to the Gmail Greasemonkey API
anyway. No extra functionality is prevented by the false positives of
GM_apiLeakCheck than would be by walling off user scripts. Sure API commands
would be disabled when user scripts and page javascript commingle, but with
GM_apiLeakCheck the API commands remain safe from the page javascript.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

-- 
Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/
Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs

Reply via email to