Comment #26 on issue 143 by [email protected]: Handle color profiles in
tagged images
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=143
A related issue is how to handle untagged images. There are two obvious
options:
1) Treat them as being in the sRGB color space
2) Treat them as being in the monitor's color profile
By default, Firefox 3.5 does (1). Safari does (2).
(1) Pro: conforms to web standard http://www.w3.org/Graphics/Color/sRGB
(1) Pro: allows users who care about color fidelity to save server disk
space by
stripping color profiles when publishing images on the web
(2) Pro: colors in untagged images will match those in Flash, since Flash
is color stupid
There is a lot of debate about which of these pros has a higher priority.
The proper
solution is of course for Flash to become color smart.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/
Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs
