You can try using the --user-data-dir flag to point the test instance of Chrome at a dedicated testing profile. That will mean the --disable-hang-monitor instance will actually stay around.
Adam On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Mike Morearty <m...@morearty.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm a developer at Adobe, on the Flash Builder (formerly Flex Builder) > team. I'm trying to figure out how to allow --disable-hang-monitor to > work even if Chrome is already running. > > Flash Builder, for those who aren't familiar with it, is a full IDE > for creating Flash (and AIR) apps; one of its features is a debugger. > So let's say you create a new project, set a breakpoint, and then > click Debug. We launch your browser pointing at the Flash app; the > Flash player that is inside the browser connects back to Flash > Builder. > > Then let's say the Flash app hits the line where the breakpoint is. > The Flash player notifies Flash Builder of the breakpoint, and then > blocks, waiting on a socket until Flash Builder tells it what to do > next (e.g. resume, single-step, etc.). > > The problem is that 30 seconds later, Chrome detects this as a hang > (which it is, but it's a deliberate one), and puts up the usual > message: > > The following plug-in is unresponsive: Shockwave Flash > Would you like to stop it? > > Even if I say No, the message keeps reappearing every 30 seconds or > so. > > I'd like to disable the message during debugging. It's easy to launch > chrome with --disable-hang-monitor, and that does work, but only if > Chrome wasn't already running before I began my debugging session. If > Chrome *was* already running, then that flag has no effect. (I > suspect probably the new instance of chrome.exe just passed control > over to the existing instance, or something like that, and did not > tell Chrome to use this flag.) > > I realize this is somewhat tricky to do. Ideally, that flag would > apply to just the one tab or window that I tried to open, but not to > all the other already-existing windows. I have not yet looked at the > Chrome/Chromium source code, but I wouldn't be surprised if this is > currently implemented as a global setting. > > Is this feasible? Is there some other way to do what I want? Should > I log an enhancement request? > > Thanks, > > - Mike Morearty > Sr. Computer Scienstist > Adobe Systems Inc. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: email@example.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---