On Sep 10, 5:51 pm, "Ian Fette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> > 1. Do Google, as a browser creator, intend to join the CA/Browser
> > Forum (http://www.cabforum.org) ?
>
> This is something we will have to discuss internally. I'm aware of CA/B
> Forum and the work that goes on there.

Google would certainly be eligible for membership, since it now
"produces a software product intended for use by the general public
for browsing the Web securely."
(See http://www.cabforum.org/forum.html).

<snip>
> > 3. Chrome on Windows appears to rely on the certificates found in the
> > Microsoft Trusted Root Certificate Store, but has its own list of EV
> > Policy OIDs (in net/base/ev_root_ca_metadata.cc).  Having done that,
> > why didn't you use the EV Policy OID metadata built in to the
> > Microsoft Trusted Root Certificate Store instead of creating your own
> > list?
>
> Do you have a pointer to any documentation on this? I'm not sure if we knew
> it existed to be perfectly honest.

I'm not aware of any official documentation from Microsoft.

<snip>
> > 5. What Root Certificates will Chrome on Mac and Linux trust, since
> > the Microsoft Trusted Root Certificate Store is Windows-only?  Why
> > didn't you use Mozilla NSS's Root Certificate DB instead, since NSS is
> > already cross-platform?  (And then, why not use Mozilla PSM's list of
> > EV Policy OIDs instead?)
>
> We want to do what's native on the platform.

What advantages do you see in taking a "what's native on the platform"
approach, rather than using NSS on all platforms (as Mozilla does) for
both the crypto code and root certificate store?

<snip>
> Green bar may appear in Chrome some day, it may not. It wasn't a high
> priority thing - I don't think it really adds much value. What it tells you
> is that a site went through an extended validation process, but that's
> really not that meaningful in my opinion - the meaningful part about EV is
> that you have a verified identity.

Agreed.

<snip>
> Telling someone to "look for the lock" is not really great advice, because
> anyone can get a certificate and "get the lock".

Agreed.  This is why the EV standard was created.

> Similarly, I don't think that telling someone to "look for the green bar" is
> good advice, because anyone can get the green bar by going through
> the validation process and supplying truthful information. (granted, it's a
> slightly higher bar, but by no means insurmountable).

I agree, but...in the real world, many CAs *are* offering this advice.

> The valuable thing is to tell someone to look at the identity information
> provided and validate that information against their expectations.

Agreed.

<snip>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Chromium-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to