I think Darwin had the right idea :-). On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Amanda Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nobody's in a position to object, though I know a bunch of people are > approaching the problem from different angles. Perhaps we'll end up > with a bake-off :-). > > More seriously, coding up an example implementation, even just as a > proof of concept, is a great way to validate a design (take a look at > Awesomium, for example--implementing it revealed a bunch of issues > that the author hadn't anticipated, which led to design changes and > some great improvements, even though it's still in the "experimental" > stage). > > --Amanda > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Daniel A. White > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Man, I am itching to help start coding this... any objections? > > > > On Nov 25, 4:04 pm, "Marshall Greenblatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> Cool, it sounds like the embedded browser spaces on linux and osx are > well > >> accounted for. For the time being I'll continue with an os-agnostic > >> approach because it's relatively painless to do so. Here, then, is the > >> embedded browser framework that I envision, complete with C++ class > >> definitions: > >> > >> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/EmbeddedBrowserFramework > >> > >> Any and all comments are welcome :-). > >> > >> - Marshall > > > > > > > > > -- > --Amanda > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
