The "official" process I thought was that the reviewer should commit a patch after reviewing. But you're right, the WebKit commit queue is well out of control.
http://webkit.org/pending-commit You could certainly bring up such on webkit-dev. -eric On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Ojan Vafai <[email protected]> wrote: > Do we have a list of chromium committers who are also webkit committers? > Should we have some sort of process for how to get help getting webkit > patches that have been r+'ed committed? Up to now, it's been an ad-hoc thing > of the committers (darin mainly) just committing all our patches. Seems like > there could be a better way. Should we have some queue of webkit patches > that need comitting maybe? Or a mailing list people can email when they have > an r+'ed patch? > This came up because we have a patch open that's now a week delayed in > getting committed since it's been r+'ed. It's not anyones fault. It just > fell through the cracks as there's no official process. > Ojan > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
