Not yet, patches are welcomed. (Note that it requires implementing the support to run custom tests, which is already implemented client-side but not server-side yet)
Also, we have 4 W2k3 servers with a lot of buildbot VM images that can be used when you need a specific OS for testing. M-A On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Adam Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can you grab the pixel results from the try server? > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Brett Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I just upgraded my dev box to one of the new quad-cores and put Vista >> 64 on it so I can use more memory for the disk cache. (Note: XP64 >> isn't one of the standard corp OS images.) I suspect more people will >> want to start doing this (I'm still doing tests, will send out the >> results). >> >> I just realized that I have a problem now: I have no way to run webkit >> pixel tests since the form control reference images all require XP's >> Luna theme. I have three boxes: Vista, Mac, and Linux, so it's not >> reasonable to get another one. It also seems impossible to require >> everybody use XP forever. >> >> WebKit solves this by putting the layout test results of each build in >> a public place on the buildbot (I don't think ours are, are they?) and >> when you change something that has a reference that isn't for your >> system, you just grab it off there, double-check that it's correct, >> and check it in. However, this requires more tolerance of test redness >> than we have had so far. >> >> The other option is to use platform-independent form control >> rendering. This actually isn't too hard. WebKit already has form >> control rendering for when you have funky CSS styles applied (think >> when you set "border-top:2px solid red;" on a text fiend) and we can >> enable this easily enough in our theme control by returning the >> correct values (maybe there are a few edge cases that need cleaning >> up). >> >> This has the advantage of letting people running XP, Vista or either >> of those with the classic theme run the layout tests in a meaningful >> way. It has the disadvantage that none of our native theme rendering >> will be covered by pixel tests, which could lead to regressions. >> >> I'm not sure which approach is better. Does anybody have any thoughts? >> >> Brett >> >> > >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
