It would be nice if these lint-y sorts of tools could be ran independently of gcl, so that our git tools could make use of them.
2009/1/22 Pam Greene <[email protected]>: > The new gcl warning for missing unit tests currently only appears on 'gcl > change', but the plan is to set up a generic alert system so gcl can tell > Rietveld to show whatever warnings it wants. This would fit well with both > of those (a warning on change, a message in Rietveld). > > - Pam > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> It'd be better to have them in rietveld instead? >> >> 2009/1/22 Paweł Hajdan Jr. <[email protected]>: >> > What would you think about few new ideas for gcl warnings? >> > >> > - warn when files are added, deleted or moved and no build file is >> > modified >> > (including vcproj, scons and pbxproj) >> > - warn when one build file is modified, but not the other (like changed >> > vcproj but no scons and vice versa) >> > >> > There's one problem, that some not-so-small part of these warnings would >> > be >> > bogus. Anyway, that's just an idea. >> > >> > (I'm not volunteering to actually make these changes, at least not at >> > this >> > moment) >> > >> > Paweł >> > >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
