Ok, I like this. The html of the chrome script is for developer/debug stuff, not for end users. Also good for easter eggs :)
How should they be able to access that? about:extensionID ? chrome-extension://<extension-id> ? -Nick On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Aaron Boodman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Matt Perry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Does anyone else have any thoughts about scripts vs full HTML? > > I think using full HTML makes sense. We get NPAPI for free out of it, > and don't have to do any extra work to block off the DOM. Also, like > Nick said, developers can use that page for debugging, status, etc. > > I don't think that we should provide an automatic way to get to this > page through the UI, though (for example via the management UI). That > would impose extra work on developers to make this page presentable. > Instead, we should have an (optional) key in the manifest for > declaring what URL to use for the "about" or "manage" page. The URL > can be a web URL, it can be inside the extension, or it could even be > this master/index page. > > - a > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
