I forgot to say that I did *not* defer tests that crash or hang. Those seem
like they should be fixed. Security tests also seem like they should never
be deferred.
Pam, is there a reasonable way to tell if we've ever passed a test?

So, here's my proposal then. From here on, when doing webkit merges, we
should defer any new tests that we add to the tests_fixable lists unless
they crash, timeout or are security tests.

Seem reasonable?

Ojan

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Adam Barth <[email protected]> wrote:

> Please also exclude security tests.
>
> Thanks,
> Adam
>
>
> On 2/19/09, Pam Greene <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Perhaps this should exclude tests that we've ever passed, since those are
> > also regressions, albeit more recent ones.
> > - Pam
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Ojan Vafai <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> In the spirit of trying to fix all the layout tests that represent
> >> real regressions since our initial launch, I've just committed a
> >> changelist that defers the tests that are failing that are new to
> >> webkit since the revision of our launch or whose expectations changed
> >> upstream (the latter was only a couple tests, the former was almost 80
> >> tests). If people think this is an awful idea, I can rollback.
> >>
> >> I don't think it makes sense to block releases to the stable channel
> >> on new tests that we've never passed. My biggest concern with each
> >> release is breaking sites that previously used to work in Chrome. New
> >> tests, for the most part, don't represent regressions like that. Does
> >> it make sense to make a policy of deferring new, failing tests from a
> >> webkit merge by default. The person doing the merge should put a good
> >> faith effort into getting it fixed, but it shouldn't block cutting a
> >> release.
> >>
> >> Eventually we'll get to a point where we only have deferred tests left
> >> and we can start tackling that long list of tests without having it
> >> hinder our ability to push releases to the stable channel.
> >>
> >> Ojan
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> > > >
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to