I actually didn't mean to start this conversation. Is there still time to run away and hide? :)
On a (slightly) more serious note, I agree with your assessment and I thought at first that there was some work being done on that. :DG< On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ojan Vafai <[email protected]> wrote: > -chromium-reviews, +chromium-dev > Not really sure. It seems to me that we need to send patches upstream to > make InspectorController not depend directly on JSC. It doesn't seem like it > should need to interact so directly with JSC. It's a non-trivial amount of > work. Is there another way we could tackle this? > Ojan > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:21 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> LGTM. >> >> BTW, what's our plan on getting this file unforked? :) >> >> http://codereview.chromium.org/27007 > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
