Woops, newbie mistake, sent from my google.com addr the first time. 2009/2/25 William Chan (陈智昌) <[email protected]>: > Sorry for not being clear. Yep, you're correct, I'm not planning use > POSIX async IO. Just planning to execute the sync IO on the > WorkerPool. > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Adam Langley <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:13 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I talked to Darin and he told me that this needs work since it's >>> impacting the page cycler times, so I figured I'd pick it up. You >>> have a TODO there saying to figure out how to best do async IO. Did >>> you ever figure this out? I talked to Darin briefly and decided that >>> the simplest thing to do for now is simply to post tasks to the global >>> WorkerPool. The global WorkerPool linux implementation looks pretty >>> silly and needs work, but it's probably good enough for the page >>> cycler. How does this approach sound to you? >> >> It's not clear if you were considering using POSIX async IO on Linux >> or not. Just in case you were: don't. It mostly doesn't work. >> >> AGL >> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
