On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:56:27AM -0700, George Djabarov wrote: > Somewhat unrelated to the mail thread, but isn't the copyright year > supposed to be <first publication date>-<last update date> format?
As I under stand it, individual files should have the year in which they were created and then subsequent updates for when they're modified in later years. When listing the project's copyright, you would then use the range(s) encompassing the dates of all components of the project. In other words, there's no reason to pre-date new files to the starting date of the overall project. > This will probably can be answered better by legal person, Agreed. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
