It certainly was my intention to have atomic changes that remove sln/vcprojs in the same change that causes them to be generated.Did you mean something stronger Mark?
-BradN On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Mark Mentovai <[email protected]> wrote: > Jim Roskind wrote: > > The problem with that list is that we alternately generate the sln > > files (from gyp), and then try to update and revert them via svn. The > > remnant files generated by gyp screw up the process :-(. > > OK, that's bad. I thought Brad took steps to ensure that we'd either > generate .sln/.vcproj files from GYP or use checked-in files but not > have them conflict. This is certainly the intended design. svn and > GYP should not be fighting. > > Brad? > > Mark > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
