On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Aaron Boodman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Brett Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Those are exposed, but I wonder which cases an extension needs to >> refer to them. They are internal IDs generated by sqlite. If you clear >> your history, you'll get re-used ones. This could also theoretically >> possible happen if you delete a single item, but I don't know if this >> happens in practice. So they are often persistent, but the way you ask >> makes me nervous. > > I'm thinking of a use case where somebody wanted to synchronize > browser history between machines. It would be more convenient to do > this if there was a unique client side ID that didn't change for each > visit.
I'm OK exposing this as long as we set expectations correctly. Brett --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
