Steven Knight wrote: > What's the workflow for enabling coverage in this model? "gclient runhooks > --force -Dcoverage=1" and then re-start XCode? > > That doesn't seem natural for the Linux side, but I could live with it. > Linux devs: comments?
I think that the variant model is a stronger way to handle coverage. Once we do have a variant-based model to handle coverage, the only thing missing from John's work would be the coverage-running target. We could easily retain that target, unconditionally, and just have the script be a no-op (or fail) when run on a coverage-free variant. Long-term, we might even want to integrate the coverage runner stuff more directly into GYP, the way we have done with test runners. Mark --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---