We want to watch directories recursively for extensions, but not for user scripts. So ideally, we'd like it to be an option. If I had to choose one, I'd say I want recursive, because it's more important to have extensions work well than to have the user script directory not work as well.
- a On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Evan Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I added DirectoryWatcher so that you could edit a script on disk and > Chromium would automatically refresh its in-memory cache of scripts. > > In the extensions world, do you still use this pattern? Do you need > to watch subdirectories as well? > > We have this bug to follow the Windows behavior > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=8968 > but there's a bunch of code and I'd like to be certain it's necessary. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
