The suggestions on that code review are good: we ought to measure how many fonts normal users see, and then pick the cache tuning parameter accordingly.
Adam Barth is a good person to ask about how to do this, since he seems to be measuring all sorts of things. On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:07 PM, David Levin <le...@chromium.org> wrote: > One of the few remaining forks is in WebCore/platform/graphics/FontCache.cpp > (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21451). > > I'll be checking in a change to remove this fork and as such we should > expect ~20% perf hit for the international page cycler. The internatonal > page cycler test intentionally uses more fonts than users are likely to use, > so the perf hit isn't something that users would notice in browsing > scenarios. > > Dave > > PS Here's the code review url: http://codereview.chromium.org/100276 > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
