I think Darin had some strong opinions about whether we should do nested schemes like feed-view:http://foo.com/bar.
>From a security point of view, we'd ideally like to render feeds with JavaScript and plug-ins disabled, as well as in a noAccess SecurityOrigin. This is easier if the feed preview lives in its own scheme. I'm happy to help out with the security bits once you have the basics up and running. Adam On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Evan Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >> - Some existing practice on the web is to use >> "feed://hostname/etc.xml", which drops the protocol (and should be >> interpreted as HTTP). Ideally you should redirect these into >> view-feed:http://hostname/etc.xml so our view-feed works with https, >> ftp, etc. URLs. > > Firefox retains the URL of the feed in the address bar (including > scheme), which is nice, though it falls back to an internal URL under > the hood to do the render of the preview. > > -Ben > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
