On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Stuart Morgan<stuartmor...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Scott Hess<sh...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> So, I'm inclined to mark it WontFix, except that then searches in the
>> Issues database won't find it.
>
> Do we think it's something people are actually likely to search for?
> The crash aggregator will still have the bug number listed for that
> stack, and that seems like the most likely (only?) place someone would
> be inspired to look for a bug about it in the first place.
Is the crash aggregator's annotation stable across releases? If so,
then that makes sense.
I was assuming that if the fingerprint changes because we rearrange
the calling sequence somehow, then maybe someone has to re-annotate
things.
-scott
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
