On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Aaron Boodman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Jeremy Orlow<[email protected]> wrote: > > What your describing sounds exactly like a "lightweight" (i.e. only the > > features you want) version of what's already out there. (At least now > that > > you've ditched the "no file generation" requirement.) > > Unless you have some requirements that are really important to the > success > > of the project/documentation that existing solutions don't satisfy, I > would > > strongly recommend against building your own tool. I think it'll be > harder > > than you expect. > > Do you have any particular aspects you think will be hard? Nothing specifically, but everything takes longer than you expect. Why are you so against existing systems if you haven't even looked into them? Anyway, I know next to nothing about automated documentation, so I'll shut up now. I'm just really surprised at how eager you are to roll your own here. J --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
