One advantage loops might have over this approach is it keeps the support more portable. This approach requires requires invoking a shell, which could be harder to keep portable, no? I was thinking of some cases where a loop that defined actions could be handy, but this style approach might also work for that. TVL
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Mark Mentovai <[email protected]> wrote: > > Michael Moss wrote: > > I agree. I thought we wanted to avoid that kind of bloat, which is why > > I went the helper script route instead of pestering for loops. If we > > add too many features, pretty soon we'll just have scons-NG (not that > > there's anything wrong with that, but I don't understand that to be > > the goal of gyp). > > It's not, but loops weren't supposed to be too ridiculous. > > I'll reserve further judgment until I've digested what you've come up > with for localizations. > > Mark > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
