On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Evan Martin<[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Ben Laurie<[email protected]> wrote: >>> There's a big comment block about five lines below where you made that >>> modification talking about how to express multiple outputs to make, >>> along with a link to a discussion of the problem in the make manual. >> >> I know. That's where I got this fix from - it's one of the suggestions >> in the manual :-) >> >> What you currently do didn't seem to quite map to their suggestions, though. > > Ah, yes, now that I reread it I see you are correct. > >>> Really, the problem is that you do not have all the dependencies in >>> front of make. The problem you're having is that files A and B >> >> Well, no ... it should retry building B because it hasn't been built >> yet. And, it should try whether I supply D.png or not. Which it does, >> with my patch. > > And again, I am wrong here and you are correct. Thank you for your > patience in explaining. :)
Of course, you are also correct, in that there's a pile of dependencies make doesn't see - as I think I've said before, I'm a fan of automatic dependency extraction, which it seems grit could easily be persuaded to spit out (just as gcc can). > Let me think about your change some more. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
