John, That would be absolutely perfect, thank you very much!
Nothing else is blocking (though there are a few bugs filed which would make things a little cleaner), the only other thing worth mentioning is that a while ago there was vague chatter about a privileged API for being able to manipulate (i.e. populate) file upload input elements from extension content scripts :) (Oh, and NPAPI support on non-windows platforms would be amazing, but I know that's coming :)) Thanks again On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:44 PM, John Grabowski<[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel, I think our current behavior is correct; Mac apps in general don't > grab focus on launch when launched from the command line. if this is the > only problem, I'd be happy to add a hook for you. E.g. an > "---activate-on-launch" command line arg. > While we are talking, is there anything else blocking you? > jrg > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Daniel Wagner-Hall <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Nico Weber<[email protected]> wrote: >> > This is probably because of the launcher changes that Mark made. When >> > I start Chromium from a terminal, it opens in the background too. >> > `osascript -e 'tell app "Chromium" to activate'` works, though (it >> > opens chromium and makes it frontmost), so perhaps you can use that >> > from Java somehow? >> >> This is fine on Mac, and if you only have one instance of Chrome, >> unfortunately neither is the case here... >> >> > I don't know what you're trying to do, but you might want to look into >> > Launch Services (and potentially a language that's not java). >> >> I'm writing Chrome support for a browser test automation tool >> (WebDriver, which is soon merging to become Selenium 2.0 [1]). >> Unfortunately, Java is a requirement (actually, so are half a dozen >> other languages in the future). As these tests tend to be run on >> machines with no user interaction, having some solution to this is >> very important. To have Chrome being the only browser out there which >> doesn't support automated testing would seem to me to be a huge blow >> (in fact, Opera at completely the other end of the spectrum and are >> building in hooks for test automation! [2]). >> >> 1: http://selenium.googlecode.com >> 2: >> http://my.opera.com/core/blog/2009/03/06/test-automation-with-operawatir >> >> >> > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
