>> Maybe r25099? I don't know how long it takes between commit time and >> when the results show up in the graph, so this is a rough guess.
the perf tests are run continuously on the buildbot, so the regression is somewhere in the range between 25120 and 25132.My suspicion lies on r25126 or 25128. >> >> r25099 -- >> Plumb request interception into the appcache library for both chrome >> and test_shell. >> ... >> Chrome: >> * Each UserProfile instantiates a ChromeAppCacheService, which is >> derived from an appcache library class. >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Evan Martin<[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/linux-release-hardy/startup/report.html?history=150 >> > >> > We seem to have lost about 50% around r25132, but the commits around >> > there aren't at all suspicious. :( >> > Any guesses? Maybe Brett's change? >> > >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
